From the bizarre world of
can-you-believe-this tabloid headlines comes a news story that has parents all
over America shaking their heads…and keeping their attorney on speed dial. That’s because Rachel Canning, an 18-year old
student from a (formerly) happy home in New Jersey has sued her parents. Canning v. Canning isn’t about any sort of
abuse or wrongdoing, thank goodness, or even her teen-angst driven quest for
emancipation. Instead, she’s suing her
parents for continued financial support and college tuition. That’s right, at 18 years old she’s a legal
adult, able to vote or enlist in the military, but she’s still attempting to
legally compel her parents to keep paying up, claiming they abandoned her.
To be clear, this is not a
landmark case. It won’t set any
precedents or achieve anything important.
In fact, it will most certainly be thrown out of court unceremoniously,
as Rachel Canning’s requests were already thrown out in an initial
hearing. Of course, there may be some
copycats cases - teens filing injunctions against cleaning their rooms, going
to arbitration to over post-prom curfew, and requesting witness protection from
embarrassing family Christmas photos.
But, if nothing else, it
might make a statement on the dangers of entitlement.
Last week, Superior Court
Family Division Judge Peter Bogaard heard the case in Morristown, New Jersey
and denied all of Canning’s complaints.
There is another hearing date set for April 22 to consider other issues
in the case, such as Canning’s legal status as a minor since she’s still in
school, but those are expected to make no headway, also.
So what’s the story behind
the court transcripts? Why would a
daughter from a nice middle class family sue her own family? All was well only a few months ago. Rachel was a senior Morris Catholic High
School, on the honor roll, a cheerleader, played lacrosse, and had earned a
$20,000 scholarship to the University of Vermont. But things seemed to have taken a turn for
the worse. She was suspended a couple
times, caught drinking, lost her role as captain of the cheerleading squad, and
was kicked out of the campus ministry.
The rift with her family initially began over a new boyfriend who the
Canning’s didn’t approve of (isn’t that always to blame with teens?!) She since moved out of their home and is
living in Rockaway Township with the family of her best friend, classmate Jaime
Inglesino. She filed the lawsuit not
long after.
In December, her parents’
attorney responded with a letter stating that her parents were happy to pay for
her health insurance and give her any and all money from a college fund that
had been created for her. But that
wasn’t enough – she wanted them to pay for college tuition and living expenses
– so the lawsuit proceeded.
When looking at this case,
it’s easy to do two things:
1) To chastise Rachel Canning as a greedy, entitled,
unappreciative gold digger in the making.
2) The other side of that coin is that she’s just 18,
and maybe mentally or emotionally still not fully aware of the implications of
her actions, though legally she is an adult.
But I place blame squarely
elsewhere. In fact, the father of the
classmate, Jaime Ingelsino, she’s living with has his grimy fingerprints all
over this case. John Inglesino happens
to be an attorney and former Morris County Freeholder. Reports have it that he heavily influenced
Rachel in her decision to sue and is funding the lawsuit himself, including
hiring her attorney. The lawsuit
included a request that the elder Cannings pay his legal fees, so far totaling
over $12,000.
We're being sued
by our child, I'm dumbfounded,” said Sean Canning. “So is my wife, so are my
other daughters. I know Rachel is a) a good kid, b) an incredibly rebellious
teen, and she's getting some terrible information.”
Rachel Canning will have to
live with this the rest of her life – the estrangement from her family, the
shame and embarrassment of being clowned on Page 6 of every tabloid, and the
scary reality of being ostracized from any school who doesn’t want the media
circus she’ll bring or any employer, who will question the permanent stain on her
character and litigious nature. Already, her name is being buffooned with countless fake social media pages. That is
the real tragedy, and she’s just beginning to pay the price for her
actions. But John Inglesino gets to live
on, the puppet master, probably out $12,000 but mowing his lawn and raising his
family and practicing law as if nothing had ever happened. Heck, his manipulation on an impressionable
and confused 18-year old may even land him a few new clients.
No comments:
Post a Comment